Canonical demo build — fictional business

Exactly the proof that exists, no more

All reviews and registration facts are fictional demo content.

Four customers gave written permission to publish their reviews. The count is stated exactly because the source chain holds exactly four permission notes.

Brightline is registered and insured for exterior contracting work under fictional registration EX-204-118, retained in the demo source chain.

Customer review

The crew cleared every downspout and showed me photos of the finished runs.

Written permission, 2026-03 (fictional).

Customer review

Scheduling was clear and the repair estimate matched the final invoice.

Written permission, 2026-04 (fictional).

Customer review

They flagged a fascia problem early instead of upselling guards we did not need.

Written permission, 2026-04 (fictional).

Customer review

Second season with Brightline; the gutters have not overflowed since.

Written permission, 2026-05 (fictional).

What was blocked

Two claims were proposed during intake and rejected: a regional speed superlative with no benchmark, and a review-volume claim that overstated the four permissioned reviews. Both stay in the ledger as blocked claims so QA can prove they never reach copy, schema, or LLM summaries.